Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Davila v. Vass et al
as 6:2019cv00389
Defendant:
Lieutenant FNU Vass and FNU Sharp
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Davila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buchi v. Utah State et al
as 2:2019cv00325
Defendant:
FNU Sharp, Andrew Mcain, Division of Homeland Security and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Victor P. Buchi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dugan v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv00234
Defendant:
First Name Unknown ("FNU") Clemmens, (FNU) Wilcox, (FNU) Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Dugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake et al v. Underwood et al
as 5:2018cv03174
Defendant:
(fnu) McGuire, Winfield Correctional Facility, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ott, Cliff Swarthout, Corey Barfoot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Lones et al
as 6:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Earnest B. Clayton
Defendant:
Laurel L. Lones, FNU Pearson, Stanley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyrian Strong v. J. Grimes, et al
as 17-51134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DYRIAN K. STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN J. GRIMES, UNIT MAJOR KIMBERLY GARZA, CAPTAIN FNU VELLA and others
Taylor v. Jackson et al
as 5:2016cv01109
Plaintiff:
Olivia J Taylor
Defendant:
Don Jackson, FNU Graves, FNU Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodson v. Sharp et al
as 1:2016cv00106
Defendant:
FNU Sharp, Rebeca Gray, Misty LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Shane Goodson
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Taylor et al
as 6:2015cv00858
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Andrew Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Greg Taylor, FNU Sharp and FNU Choates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strong vs Grimes et al
as 4:2015cv00009
Defendant:
Unit Major Kimberly Garza, Warden J. Grimes, FNU Quintila and others
Plaintiff:
Dyrian Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
