Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hopper v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Gary McFadden, FNU LeBliss, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Hall et al
as 5:2021cv03130
Defendant:
(fnu) Hall, (fnu) Messler and (fnu) Walter
Plaintiff:
Donnie Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. County of Alameda et al
as 4:2019cv05677
Defendant:
FNU Walter, Jeff Edwards and County of Alameda
Plaintiff:
Daisy Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin Heathman v. Chris Blair, et al
as 15-15450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUSTIN HEATHMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS BLAIR, individually and in his official capacity, PAUL LAXTON, individually and in his official capacity, CLINT BOWEN, individually and in his official capacity and others
Ruben Anderson v. Walter, et al
as 15-40002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUBEN SOLIS ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MS. FNU WALTER, Head of Classification Department, G.I. DEPARTMENT, All Sergeants, Lieutenants, Correctional Officers, and Mr. Canno, CAPTAIN FNU OAKES, Segregation Department and others
Heathman v. Blair et al
as 5:2014cv00662
Plaintiff:
Dustin Heathman
Defendant:
Chris Blair, Paul Laxton, Clint Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Walter et al
as 5:2014cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Walter, G.I. Department, FNU Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Gooden et al
as 5:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
F Gooden, FNU Foster, FNU Presnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Grounds et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Ruben Solis Anderson
Defendant:
D Grounds, FNU Calfee, W Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Jane Doe #1 et al
as 6:2013cv06142
Plaintiff:
Nathan Gordon Lackey
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
