Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Forbes v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2026cv14191
Plaintiff:
Denise Forbes
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Plastics a/k/a Plastics Technologies, Inc., Monsanto Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Forbes v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2026cv14191
Defendant:
GE Plastics, General Electric Company, Plastics Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Forbes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Forbes v. Stafford County School Board, et al.
as 1:2026cv02980
Plaintiff:
Ashley A. Forbes
Defendant:
Stafford County School Board and Elizabeth Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Forbes v. Drewry et al
as 6:2026cv00413
Plaintiff:
Brandon Craig Forbes
Defendant:
Christina Drewry, Austin Reeve Jackson, District Attorney Jacob Putman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Forbes
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Forbes v. Drewry et al
as 1:2026cv02384
Plaintiff:
Brandon Craig Forbes
Defendant:
Christina Drewry, Judge Austin Reeve Jackson, Jacob Putman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
