Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Waterman v. Conard, et al
as 22-3086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN MICHAEL WATERMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JACOB CONARD, Prosecutor, in his individual and official capacity, FORREST ALLEN LOWRY, Esq., Attorney, in his individual and official capacity, LA DELL TURLEY, Court Reporter, in her individual and official capacity and others
Smith v. Dodge et al
as 9:2018cv01066
Defendant:
C.O. P. McNally, C.O. J. Ashline, C.O. S. Dodge and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brignac v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv04907
Plaintiff:
David Brignac
Defendant:
Frederick Smith, Robert Stoltz, Paul D. Connick, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #158371 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00553
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith #158371
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Tom Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv11929
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel Heyns, Tom Combs and others
US v. Frederick Brook
as 12-7747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FREDERICK SMITH BROOKS, a/k/a Spoon
Brooks v. USA
as 6:2012cv02235
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Frederick Smith Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SMITH v. HESS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv02241
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SMITH
Defendant:
HESS CORPORATION, CORALUZZO CORPORATION and FEMALE GAS ATTENDANT X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Petitioner:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Worthy et al
as 4:2007cv10243
Plaintiff:
Frederick Smith
Defendant:
Kim Worthy and Prentis Edwards
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
