Cases 21 - 30 of 2,847
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5219
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
Eric Drake v. FedEx Corporation, et al
as 24-5217
Plaintiff:
ERIC DRAKE
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC., FREDRICK W. SMITH and others
D. et al v. Lake Central School Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Brian D. and Erika D.
Defendant:
Lake Central School Corporation, Larry Veracco and Ron Fredrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sefe Almedom v. George Fredrick
as 24-3171
Petitioner:
SEFE A. ALMEDOM
Respondent:
GEORGE A. FREDRICK, Warden
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 28 Merritt Trace, Brunswick, GA 31525
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 28 Merritt Trace, Brunswick, GA 31525
Claimant:
Dante Fredrick and Asaad Amir Hasuan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
Brown v. Otts et al
as 6:2024cv06017
Plaintiff:
Ce'drick D. Brown
Defendant:
Major Fredrick Otts, Sergeant B. Morgan and Corporal Shanlever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. King
as 1:2024cv01330
Petitioner:
Fredrick Jones
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Graham v. Abbey O'Brien, et al
as 24-1295
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Abbey O'Brien, Unknown Probation Officer #1, Unknown Probation Officer #2 and others
US v. Fredrick McCray
as 24-4078
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREDRICK WENDELL MCCRAY, a/k/a Dub
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
