Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LAGUERRE v. HOLCOMB
as 3:2026cv04733
Plaintiff:
KEVENS LAGUERRE
Defendant:
GREGORY HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcombe v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv07374
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Holcombe
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Holcomb v. USA
as 3:2026cv00199
Petitioner:
Kristopher Brandon Holcomb
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Walker v. Holcomb
as 1:2026cv02071
Petitioner:
Samuel Jacob Walker
Respondent:
Rocky Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KELLY v. PETERSON et al
as 3:2026cv04556
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L KELLY
Defendant:
KENNETH J PETERSON, GREGORY M HOLCOMB, JOHNATHAN L PATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton-Hypes v. Trueheart et al
as 7:2026cv00522
Plaintiff:
Angelia C. Burton-Hypes
Defendant:
Tori Trueheart, R. Bowden, J. Hollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SF Atlanta 1 LLC v. Brightwell
as 1:2026cv03555
Plaintiff:
SF Atlanta 1 LLC Corners at Holcomb Bridge
Defendant:
Keena Brightwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
(SS) Holcomb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02249
Plaintiff:
Nikki Ann Holcomb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holcomb et al v. Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC
as 0:2026cv03065
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC and Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC
Plaintiff:
Brian Holcomb and Karen Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Holcomb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026at01068
Plaintiff:
Nikki Ann Holcomb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
