Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Carter v Huhn
as 2:2023cv04227
Plaintiff:
William Bill G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Willie Rogers
Defendant:
Nikolos Anderson, Matthew Henson, Kimberly Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Latorre v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jorge Latorre
Defendant:
Brown, Charles Daniels, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLAME-BEY v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC. et al
as 1:2023cv01325
Plaintiff:
YOHAN BIC FLAME-BEY
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC., JASON G. CARTER, EMRY MCALEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Huhn et al
as 2:2023cv04142
Plaintiff:
William Billy G Carter
Defendant:
Valerie Huhn, Lee Ann McVay, Mary Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Carter Bros. Automotive Repairs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04710
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carter Bros. Automotive Repairs, Inc., Stephen G Carter and Carter Brothers Repairs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LAY v. CARTER
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LAY
Defendant:
JASON G. CARTER, JASON G. CARTER, MD and CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
