Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aaron Clark, IV v. Adams, et al
as 22-1620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ADAMS, T. LOVATO, Correctional Officer, RALPH SACKETT, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Clark #222915 v. Adams et al
as 2:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
Unknown Adams, T. Lovato, R. Sackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs v. Social Security et al
as 4:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tubbs
Defendant:
Social Security and Allen G Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tubbs v. Social Security et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MC 13-447. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2013mc00447
Plaintiff:
Robert L Tubbs
Defendant:
Social Security and Allen G Erickson
Coates v. Erickson
as 1:2012cv11839
Plaintiff:
Norticia Jeanette Coates
Defendant:
Allen G Erickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Coates v. Erickson
as 2:2012cv00622
Plaintiff:
Norticia Coates
Defendant:
Allen G Erickson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
ERICKSON v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38406
Plaintiff:
DELANO G. ERICKSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ERICKSON v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31995
Plaintiff:
DELANO G. ERICKSON
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MTS Lawn & Landscaping Services, Inc. v. East Lansing Postal Service et al
as 1:2009cv01094
Plaintiff:
MTS Lawn & Landscaping Services, Inc.
Defendant:
East Lansing Postal Service and Cynthia G. Erickson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
ERICKSON v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2008cv90860
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR G. ERICKSON, JR.
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
