Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robert G. Wright v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03099
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Karl Mitchell v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 23-6077
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARL C. MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and J. G. WRIGHT
Mitchell v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv01426
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia and J. G. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Wright
as 8:2021cv01526
Defendant:
Elizabeth G. Wright
Plaintiff:
Arthur C. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Wright v. Health Care Administrator et al
as 5:2017ct03186
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Wright
Defendant:
Health Care Administrator, Joseph Coakley, J. Tarovisky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. United States of America et al
as 5:2013ct03224
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
United States of America, C/O Williamson, C/O Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Melvin Wright
as 13-6762
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MELVIN G. WRIGHT
Wright et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05348
Plaintiff:
Charlene I. Wright and Jeffrey G. Wright
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00014
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Daryl G Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bright v. Harford Community College et al
as 1:2011cv00985
Plaintiff:
Loraine L. Bright
Defendant:
Harford Community College , James F. LaCalle , Avery Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
