Cases 1 - 10 of 24
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Lovett et al
as 5:2022cv00282
Petitioner:
Duane C. Allen
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett, G.M. Alprin, Muriel Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Wood
as 3:2021cv00841
Plaintiff:
Ernest Judge Smith, III
Defendant:
G.M. Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE et al v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2020cv00586
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., G.M. HORTH, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph v. Brinkley et al
as 3:2020cv00725
Defendant:
G.M. Brinkley, D. Gill and P. Pingree
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ralph, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Talib v. Anders et al
as 3:2017cv00452
Plaintiff:
Naiym Shahaab Talib
Defendant:
G.M. Anders, Christopher Trowell, Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Benjamin et al
as 3:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Regan T. James
Defendant:
Stephen Benjamin, Daniel Hood, Jeffery Kraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominquez v. Schneiderman et al
as 6:2016cv06292
Plaintiff:
Ralph Dominquez
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, Peter H. Schiff, Marcus J. Mastracco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallegos v. Stainer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01397
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Gallegos
Defendant:
Michael Stainer, Matthew Cates, Jeffery Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2012ct03172
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Harris
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, G.M. Shafritz, Emily Misty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
