Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Maize v. Monfra et al
as 2:2013cv05911
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Maize
Defendant:
Sue Ellen Monfra, Gary Cook, Sgt. Kerrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colleen Cimerman v. Gary Cook
as 13-3564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLLEEN CIMERMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY COOK, in his official capacity as Judge
Cook et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20462
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Alice M Cook and Steven Gary Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20371
Plaintiff:
Gary Cook
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittington v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2013cv00561
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jude Whittington
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Newell Normand , Gary Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
GARY COOK
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Maize v. Monfra et al
as 2:2012cv02619
Plaintiff:
Jacoby Antwine Maize
Defendant:
Sue Ellen Monfra , Gary Cook and Newell Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Normand et al
as 2:2012cv01579
Plaintiff:
Jerbaum Demetrica Williams
Defendant:
Newell Normand , Gary Cook , Sue Ellen Monfra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vidal v. Johns et al
as 4:2012cv00988
Defendant:
Bryon Johns , Gary Brown , Gary Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cimerman v. Cook
as 3:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
Colleen Cimerman
Defendant:
Gary Cook
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
