Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Scott et al v. Franyk Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
LYDELL SCOTT and ADRIENNE SCOTT
Defendant:
FRANYK, INC. and GEORGELY EUGENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
George Cross v. Patrick Covello
as 23-15355
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE EUGENE CROSS
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
CREWS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15264
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EUGENE CREWS and GEORGE EUGENE CREWS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(HC) Cross v. Covello
as 2:2022cv00682
Petitioner:
George Eoao Cross and George Eugene Cross
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Creel v. Clarke County Jail et al
as 2:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
George Eugene Creel, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Barry White, Clarke County Jail, Sheriff Todd Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
George Eugene Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Pate
as 6:2019cv06012
Defendant:
George Eugene Pate
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
CARRAWAY v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2017cv22929
Plaintiff:
TERRY CARRAWAY
Defendant:
JUAN J PEREZ , GEORGE EUGENE and MIAMI DADE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosabal-Rodriguez v. Marten Transport, Ltd. et al
as 1:2016cv04097
Plaintiff:
Andres Rosabal-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Marten Transport, Ltd. and George Eugene Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosabal-Rodriguez v. The Insurance Company of State of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2016cv01014
Plaintiff:
Andres Rosabal-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Marten Transport, Ltd. and George Eugene Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
