Cases 1 - 10 of 4,005
Worden v. Gearland et al
as 4:2024cv11191
Plaintiff:
Marc David Worden
Defendant:
Glenn Gearland, T. Blain, Gary Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
(PC) Bonilla v. Glenn County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Glenn County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00159
Petitioner:
Darryl Glenn Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Glenn et al
as 1:2024cv11115
Plaintiff:
Nijyal S. Gray
Defendant:
Glenn, Costello, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. McCormick et al
as 6:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike McCormick, Joel Ware, Chief S. Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Correction Department, C.O. Ceesay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. USA et al
as 3:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Glenn Cook
Defendant:
USA, Dr. R. Pass, L. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
