Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Varbel v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2011cv01801
Plaintiff:
Duane Varbel
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC and Executive Trustee Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jerry Chen et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2011cv06491
Plaintiff:
Jerry Chen and Xiu Zhen Zhou
Defendant:
Does, Executive Trustee Services LLC, GMAC Mortgage LLC and others
CRONK v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
as 2:2011cv04173
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH CRONK
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC
as 4:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Davis and Ellen O Davis
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. v. GMAC Mortgage LLC
as 0:2011cv61526
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A.
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Counter_claimant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2011cv11136
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Moore
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC and Orlans Moran, PLLC
Counter_claimant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC
Counter_defendant:
Elizabeth Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILLIAMS et al v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03706
Plaintiff:
DAISHA WILLIAMS and ZAKI BEY
Defendant:
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL LLC, GEORGE WESTALL, GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Kinworthly et al v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 5:2011cv00877
Defendant:
Does and GMAC Mortgage LLC
Plaintiff:
David Kinworthly and Leslie Kinworthy
Dubrock v. GMAC Mortgage LLC
as 4:2011cv00324
Plaintiff:
Darren L Dubrock
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penny Johnson v. Law Offices of Shapiro
as 11-1551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PENNY JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICES OF SHAPIRO & BRUNSON, LLP
Defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE LLC and USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
