Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lee v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services, et al.
as 26-6040
Plaintiff:
SUMOYYAH LEE, Individually and as successor-in-interest
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BRANDON T. NICHOLS, Director of DCFS and others
Perry v. Harrison et al
as 2:2026cv13310
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Perry, IV
Defendant:
Ricardo Harrison, Gowdy, Ohrman and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johnson v. Gowdy et al
as 5:2026cv13032
Plaintiff:
Terrell Johnson
Defendant:
Gowdy, Curtis, Wyse and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Oliver v. Gowdy et al
as 3:2026cv00428
Plaintiff:
Aaron Latrell Oliver
Defendant:
Charlie Ryan Gowdy, Atanas Boykov, Boykov Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Nathaniel Gowdy et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2026cv04227
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gowdy and Carrie Schreck
Defendant:
Jim McDonnell, City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Perez v. HHS
as 26-1427
Plaintiff:
ERIC ANDREW PEREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., Secretary HHS and others
GOWDY et al v. BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv02168
Plaintiff:
GARTH GOWDY and DEWAYNE GOWDY
Defendant:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv06291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Juanita Gowdy v. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, et al
as 25-3770
Plaintiff:
JUANITA GOWDY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER, JAMES KOBAK, ANDRE HULING and others
Amicus Curiae:
PARIS KING-MALONE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
