Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv02203
Plaintiff:
Gregory Shane Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SHANE v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03807
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SHANE
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
HEGE v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01171
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SHANE HEGE
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gregory Kinnard, Jr. v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 19-1014
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY SHANE KINNARD, JR.
KINNARD v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
GREGORY SHANE KINNARD, JR.
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mandel Metals, Inc. v. S.B. Southern Welding, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2016cv07859
Defendant:
S.B. Southern Welding, L.L.C. and Gregory Shane Boston
Plaintiff:
Mandel Metals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory Shane Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gregory Kinnard, Jr. v. Michael George, et al
as 16-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SHANE KINNARD, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. GEORGE, Coram Non Judice 51st Dist. Judge and THOMAS R. CARR, Coram Non Judice 51st District Magistrate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
