Cases 31 - 40 of 8,026
Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael David Tupac and Michael David Tupac
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group Inc, Asbury Arlington MB, LLC, Malcolm Russell Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Parker v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
AIDAN GAGE PARKER
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gage v. Mayo Clinic, et al.
as 23-4410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLY GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYO CLINIC and MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA
Gage v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 23-4232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALLY GAGE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Crippin #682304 v. Strickland et al
as 1:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Devin James-Richard Crippin #682304
Defendant:
Unknown Strickland, Unknown Hicks, Unknown Armio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 7:2023cv05771
Defendant:
Clark-Reliance LLC, Crane Instrumentation & Sampling Pft Corp, Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D King and Lonie C King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Proto Gage, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
as 23-1930
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PROTO GAGE, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
