Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Jones v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00856
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Jones
Defendant:
Darrell Moore, Pamela Lee, Alana (Surname Refused) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Green
as 1:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Jones
Defendant:
Dionna Green, Dr. Tedla, K. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hinds v. Jones et al
as 4:2021cv00173
Defendant:
Warden Michael Bates, Bobby Lumpkin and Gary Bernard Jones
Plaintiff:
Darrell Anthony Hinds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv39370
Plaintiff:
GARY C JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holliday et al v. Crowley et al
as 4:2020cv02218
Defendant:
Francisco Gras, David J Crowley, Randall Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Trustee Mark E Holliday, GOK Liquidating Trust and Mark E Holliday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Jones v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv80959
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Apotex Corp., Walmart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Mark Jones and Devenna Jo Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00612
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gary L. Jones v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2019cv01438
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
