Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gary Norman v. The Central Trust Bank, et al
as 20-1876
Defendant / Appellee:
Investor Services Insurance, Inc., All Shareholders, Directors, Additional Directors, Officers, Chairman of the Board, Owners and All Spouses, All Secured Parties and All Spouses, Central Bank of Audrian County, All Shareholders, Directors, Additional Directors, Officers, Chairman of the Board, Owners and All Spouses, All Secured Parties and All Spouses, Trans Union, Owners, Officers & Employees and Spouses and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary W. Norman
Norman v. The Central Trust Bank Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv03295
Defendant:
Dogwood Insurance Agency, L.L.C., Metcalf Bank, First National Bank of Audrian County and others
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Norman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
NORMAN v. MONROE COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2017cv03418
Defendant:
MONROE COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE NORMAN
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Norman et al
as 3:2017cv00471
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Gary F. Norman and P&S Transportation, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Stacy Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Madden v. Cleveland County, et al
as 16-6351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ALAN MADDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEVELAND COUNTY, JUSTIN LAWRENCE PITTMAN, Cleveland County Sheriff's Office, DENY OESTERLING, Norman Police Officer, individually and in his official capacity and others
Byrd v. P&S Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00563
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Gary F. Norman, P&S Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kedrick Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Norman v. City of Washington, Georgia
as 1:2013cv00046
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Norman
Defendant:
City of Washington, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
