Cases 1 - 10 of 100
In re: Gary Rock
as 26-2814
Petitioner:
In re: GARY LEE ROCK
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI
Beatty v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2026ct03211
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Beatty, Jr.
Defendant:
Lester L. Mitchell, Pazavar Priest, C/O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esparza v. Industrial Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00435
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Esparza, Jr
Defendant:
Industrial Maintenance, Inc., Gary Lee Runnels and Eddie Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
In re Gary Lee Finley
as 2:2026rd00074
Unknown:
Gary Lee Finley
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Defer et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 2:2026cv01946
Plaintiff:
Sarai Defer and Gary Lee Yocum Jr.
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KAY v. CORRECTION CARE SOLUTIONS et al
as 1:2026cv00118
Plaintiff:
GARY LEE KAY
Defendant:
CORRECTION CARE SOLUTIONS, CATHERINE FISHER, ALLEN BUDEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Spartanburg County Detention Center
as 4:2026cv01736
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Page
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
CAIN v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2026cv00961
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Cain, Jr.
Respondent:
Randy Irwin, Attorney General (of) Pennsylvania and District Attorney of Centre County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00891
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Neill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KAY v. SAWTELLE et al
as 2:2026cv00410
Petitioner:
GARY LEE KAY
Respondent:
JOHN SAWTELLE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
