Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Williamson v. Genentech, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01840
Plaintiff:
Andrew Williamson
Defendant:
Genentech, Inc. and Genentech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matsuno v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01333
Defendant:
Genentech USA, Inc., Genentech, Inc., Roche Laboratories Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Matsuno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEDES v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00881
Defendant:
CHUGAI PHARMAMANUFACTURING CO., LTD., GENENTECH USA, INC., GENENTECH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DIANE LEDES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pool v. F. Hoffman-La Roche, Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01005
Defendant:
Roche Laboratories, Inc., Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Genentech USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Markell Pool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guidry v. Roche Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv08484
Defendant:
ROCHE THERAPEUTICS INC , GENENTECH USA, INC. , ROCHE GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Guidry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MARTON v. GENENTECH USA INC.
as 1:2018cv01026
Defendant:
GENENTECH USA INC.
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE MARTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Guidry v. Roche Therapeutics Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00202
Defendant:
Roche Therapeutics Inc. , Genentech USA, Inc , Roche Group and others
Plaintiff:
Lynn Guidry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Richmann v. Genentech USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
William A Richmann
Defendant:
Genentech USA, Inc. , Stericycle Communication Solutions, Inc. , Anonymous Healthcare Provider #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Fosamax, et al
as 14-2447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA DISOSWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCK & CO INC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GENENTECH INC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
