Cases 1 - 10 of 33
In Re: Maroun, Jr.
as 23-8010
Respondent:
GEORGE CHARLES MAROUN, JR.
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
ECKMEYER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47300
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHARLES F ECKMEYER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
George G, LLC v. George Charles Salon Inc.
as 1:2021cv02651
Plaintiff:
George G, LLC d/b/a George the Salon and George G, LLC doing business as George the Salon
Defendant:
George Charles Salon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
George Benjamin, Jr. v. Brian Clark, et al
as 21-1361
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BRIAN S. CLARK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE CHARLES BENJAMIN, JR.
Benjamin v. Clark et al
as 1:2020cv01991
Defendant:
Guy Beneventano, Joseph A. Crucillo, Stephen B. Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
George Charles Benjamin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maroun et al v. Norfolk & Dedham Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv11523
Defendant:
Norfolk & Dedham Fire Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and jeffrey owens
Plaintiff:
Kristin Renee Maroun and George Charles Maroun Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49246
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHARLES MILLS III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Hood et al
as 2:2020cv00527
Defendant:
Robert Hood and John Samaniego
Plaintiff:
George Charles Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalivretenos v. Phelps
as 4:2020cv01279
Petitioner:
George Charles Kalivretenos
Respondent:
S. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SLEEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27862
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CHARLES SLEEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
