Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hatfield v. CIR
as 22-60504
Petitioner / Appellant: Arlin George Hatfield, III
Respondent / Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00711
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Hatfield v. Herrin
as 3:2017cv00669
Plaintiff: Arlin George Hatfield, III
Defendant: David V. Herrin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hatfield et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-17131
Plaintiff: Connie Hatfield and George Hatfield, Jr.
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Hatfield et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv17131
Plaintiff: Connie Hatfield and George Hatfield, Jr.
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torrence v. Hseuh et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01222
Plaintiff: Deavon E. Torrence
Defendant: F. Hseuh, - Saukhla, C. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akpuchukwu v. Richardson et al
as 1:2009cv02621
Plaintiff: Lazarus Akpuchukwu
Defendant: L. Rick Richardson, George Hatfield and George Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Akpuchukwu v. Richardson et al
as 1:2009cv01786
Plaintiff: Lazarus Akpuchukwu
Defendant: L. Rick Richardson, George Hatfield and George Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00234
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mullis v. VanDyck et al
as 1:2009cv00928
Plaintiff: Gary DeWayne Mullis
Defendant: B. J. VanDyck, Charles Ray Scott, David R. Yood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?