Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Tippins v. US
as 22-1462
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONIA TIPPINS, DERRIK MAGNUSON, GEORGE HOLLOWAY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Holloway v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv02225
Plaintiff:
George Holloway
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holloway v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as ALN/4:17-cv-00527
Plaintiff:
George Holloway
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Holloway v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
George Holloway
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway et al v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
as 3:2015cv05047
Plaintiff:
George Holloway and Georgia Holloway
Defendant:
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
George Holloway
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Holloway v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
George Holloway
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
HOLLOWAY v. MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO. et al
as 2:2008cv69678
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO., AMERICAN OPITCAL CORPORATION, THE BENDIX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
