Cases 1 - 10 of 22
GIEL v. NORTHWEST BANK
as 2:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
JAYME GIEL
Defendant:
NORTHWEST BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01683
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. Daniel et al
as 6:2018cv06024
Plaintiff:
Larry David Davis
Defendant:
Brian Daniel, Russell, Kim Giels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giel v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01331
Plaintiff:
Diane Giel
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIEL et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv00772
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GIEL and ESTATE OF MAY GIEL
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB, et al.,
as 3:2014cv06872
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ADAMS , BARBARA ALKIRE , DELBERT L. AMOS and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruiz-Giel v. Holder
as 14-9510
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO RUIZ-GIEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Pitchford v. King et al
as 3:2012cv01879
Correctional Officer:
J. Briggs
Uperintendent:
J. Decamp
Grievance Coordinator:
M. Giels
ODOC Assitant Director:
M. Gower
Sergant:
R. King
Plaintiff:
Brent Gordon Pitchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davidson et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Richard Davidson , David Butler , Patrick Hahne and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company , Sanofi-Aventis U.S., L.L.C. , Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
