Cases 1 - 10 of 1,751
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carol Givens v. John Longwell, et al
as 24-3324
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. GIVENS
Defendant:
JOHN LONGWELL, GREG P. GIVENS and VILLAGE OF SHADYSIDE, OH
Watson v. Givens et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Julian Brett Watson
Defendant:
Adrienne Givens and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Givens v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65173
Plaintiff:
William J. Givens
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Pamela Givens, Sandra May, Shirley Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
(PC) Bonilla v. Givens
as 2:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Debra Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Givens
as 2:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Debra Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Givens v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
