Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Williams, Travis v. Hoem, Stacy et al
as 3:2019cv00944
Defendant:
Gline, Theron Gage, Sing-Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Williams
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glines et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04153
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rose Naomi Glines and Danny L Glines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koontz v. Kimberley
as 1:2019cv01321
Defendant:
Daniel Monn, Clayton Stottlemyer, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
David Koontz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 131 Pension Fund v. Glines et al
as 5:2018cv00188
Defendant:
Lois Anna Glines, Stephen Scott LaPage and Robert Michael LaPage
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 131 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Glines v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01444
Plaintiff:
Alen Glines
Defendant:
Dr. Butalid, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glines-Haney v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01822
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Kristina M. Glines-Haney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Akira Ishiyama v. Samuel Glines et al
as 2:2016cv07725
Defendant:
Samuel M Glines, MO and Jerrold Krystoff
Plaintiff:
Akira Ishiyama, CA
Unknown:
Anne R Kerns, Shlomo S Sherman, Gary M Smith and others
Gold Krown Fund, LLC v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2016cv23525
Plaintiff:
Gold Krown Fund, LLC
Defendant:
Michael R Shapiro , Samuel M Glines , Henry Marx and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith Amaral et al v. Google Inc.
as 5:2016cv02553
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Amaral , Nanor Aghamal , Jonathon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ishiyama v. Glines et al
as 2:2016cv00222
Defendant:
Samuel M Glines, MO and Jerrold Krystoff, FL
Plaintiff:
Akira Ishiyama, CA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
