Cases 1 - 10 of 327
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rose Meacham v. University of Illinois, et al
as 24-1705
Plaintiff:
ROSE MEACHAM
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM, GOOGLE, LLC and others
Strong v. YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
as 1:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Elbaum v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2024cv02294
Plaintiff:
Saul Elbaum
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrillo v. Simple Mobile Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Simple Mobile Wireless, Google Incorporated, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrillo v. Progressive Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Tempe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Walker v. Google Company et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Mr. Willie Cal Walker
Defendant:
Google Company, infro@referleadersettlement.com, Horizon Acturial Settlement Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
