Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 14,081
Borne v Anco Insulations, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00134
3Rd Party Defendant: Bayer Cropscience, LP, Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust, CBS Corporation and others
Defendant: Crane Co., Ingersoll-Rand Company, The McCarty Corporation and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: International Paper Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated f/k/a Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rueben Borne and Reuben Borne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boggs et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00121
Defendant: Navistar Inc., Gardner Denver, Inc., Meritor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Raegena Boggs and Paul Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puffinberger et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant: Navistar Inc., Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company, Sundyne Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Gilbert "John" Puffinberger and Francis Puffinberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Swiger et al v. A.R. Wilfley & Sons, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00117
Defendant: Zurn Industries, Inc., PREMIERE REFRACTORIES, INC., Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Bryan K. Swiger and Lyle Swiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Michael Twombly v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10236
Defendant: Aurora Pump, Ford Motor Company, VAPOR POWER INTERNATIONAL and others
Cross Defendant: Crosby Valve, LLC, Crane Co., York International Corporation and others
Cross Claimant: General Electric Company, COPES VULCAN, INC., The Budd Company and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TWOMBLY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF WILBUR TWOMBLY and Michael Twombly
3Rd Party Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Not Classified By Court: Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROGERS v. A. O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv05666
Defendant: CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, TEXTRON and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROGERS v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al
as 2:2019cv05544
Defendant: TEXTRON, SELBY BATTERSBY AND COMPANY, GOODYEAR CANADA and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Marietta Yaw, et al v. GE, et al
as 19-35816
Defendant / Appellee: FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, also as successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant: WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, VIKING PUMP, INC., GARDNER-DENVER, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DONALD ARTHUR YAW
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIETTA DIANNE YAW, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Donald Arthur Yaw
Stecher et al v. Aerco International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv08029
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Company, Inc., Union Carbide and others
Plaintiff: Raymond Stecher and Dianne Stecher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?