Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hair v. Kisseih et al
as 2:2026cv03003
Plaintiff:
Izell DeWayne Hair
Defendant:
Ms. Kisseih, Mr. M. Moultrie, Mr. D. Stonebreaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAVES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv09240
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GRAVES
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Graves
as 1:2026cv00280
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Defendant:
Tali Graves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerome Hulsey v. David Perdue, et al
as 26-12555
Plaintiff:
JEROME HULSEY
Defendant:
DAVID PERDUE, TOM GRAVES and FBI
Oaklea Security Services, LLC v. Grave et al
as 1:2026cv00026
Plaintiff:
oaklea security services, LLC
Defendant:
Douglas Grave, Steven douglas, Rex Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
GRAVES v. HOBSON et al
as 1:2026cv01528
Plaintiff:
BEYONCA GRAVES
Defendant:
INDIA HOBSON, LOVE, JOHN MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAVES v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2026cv00186
Plaintiff:
BEYONCA GRAVES
Defendant:
SCOTT MAPLES, THOMAS, OLFTLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRAVES v. RUSSELL et al
as 1:2026cv01526
Plaintiff:
BEYONCA GRAVES
Defendant:
BONNIE RUSSELL, SINGH and TAYLOR KELLUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANTIAGO v. GRAVES
as 5:2026cv05018
Petitioner:
LATASHA ANN SANTIAGO
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT GRAVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graves v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02884
Plaintiff:
Justin Graves
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
