Cases 21 - 30 of 8,110
STEAD et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al.
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. STEAD, SR. and SUSAN A. STEAD
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al., EXCELSIOR INC., GRINELL CORPORATION and others
Petitioner:
ViacomCBS Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Knox et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Knox, Rosemarie Knox and Bayer Cropscience Inc., Successor in interest to Amchem Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alliance Laundry Systems LLC Individually and as successor-in-interest to American Laundry Machinery Co., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Boiler Company, Crane Co., Crosby Valve, LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
General Electric Company
Interested Party:
Defendants Liaison Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Halowell et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv07647
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Halowell, Sr. and Martha C. Halowell
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Carrier Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Elorreaga et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 4:2021cv05696
Defendant:
ABB, Inc., IMO Industries, Inc., ITT Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Elorreaga and Rosemary Elorreaga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gordon v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. et al
as 5:2021cv01097
Defendant:
Hollow Center Packing Co., John Doe (1 through 100), BASF Catalysts LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon and David W. Gordon, Sr.
Cross Claimant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennino et al v. Reilly-Benton Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Goulds Pumps IPG, LLC, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Industrial Holdings Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Dana Companies LLC, Honeywell International Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
McDermott, Inc., Eagle Inc., Glazer Steel Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Pennino, Sally Pennino and Salvador Pennino
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Albert J. Bossier, Jr.
Not Classified By Court:
Link-Belt Construction Equipment Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HOLCZER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv00419
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, SQUARE D COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. HOLCZER and WANDA HOLCZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HOLCZER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv00420
Defendant:
SQUARE D COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, HARDIE TYNES and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. HOLCZER and WANDA HOLCZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
David Martincic, et al v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 20-3068
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUMPS, SAUER INC, SWINDELL-DRESSLER INTERNATIONAL CO and others
Defendant:
BMI REFRACTORY SERVICES INC, SULZER PUMPS SOLUTIONS INC, FKA Ahlstrom Pumps LLC, EICHLEAY CORP and others
Defendant / Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERL WILLIAMS, His Husband and DAVID P. MARTINCIC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
