Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
United States of America v. One Gold Chain With Diamonds and Giraffe Pendant With Diamonds et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One Gold Chain With Diamonds and Giraffe Pendant With Diamonds, One Gold Chain With Box Logo Pendant With Diamonds, One Gold Bracelet With Giraffe Logos and Maybach Logo With Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. Chen et al
as 1:2023cv01273
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Shu Chen, Yong Hui Chen and Green Emerald Paradise, LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 116 Rockbridge Greens Blvd., Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 116 Rockbridge Greens Blvd., Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $189,490 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2023cv00665
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In Re: The Matter of $189,490 in U.S. Currency and $189,490 in U.S. Currency
Claimant: YanYang Ge and Khari Greene
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Greene
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Alexander Greene
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 853 Forfeiture Property - Firearms
United States of America v. Real Property Known as 324 Oak Meadow Lane, Cedar Hill, TX et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Real Property Known as 324 Oak Meadow Lane Cedar Hill, TX, Real Property Known as 1015 Aries Street, Cedar Hill, TX, Real Property Known as 5605 S Cockrell Hill Road, Dallas, TX and others
Claimant: Venture Properties Inc., Dallas County, Cedar Hill Independent School District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
USA v. 1.One Genuine Mens Rolex Watch, Submariner Style, 41MM, Sapphire Crystal, Blue Ceramic Bezel Blue Dial, Serial No. 386U64F7 et al
as 3:2023cv01016
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 1). ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLUE CERAMIC BEZEL BLUE DIAL, SERIAL NO. 386U64F7;, [2] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, STAINLESS STEEL & 18K YELLOW GOLD, SERIAL NO. 42DM7808;, [3] ONE GENUINE MENS ROLEX WATCH, SUBMARINER STYLE, 41MM, SAPPHIRE CRYSTAL, BLACK DIAL W/CERAMIC BLACK BEZEL, SERIAL NO. 554825R6; and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $4,815,369.94
as 1:2022cv04946
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $4,815,369.94, 365 Wellness LLC, 5 Star Nutrition LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. 216,200.00 in US Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00866
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: 216,200.00 in US Currency, 1,001.00 in US Currency, $216,200.00 in US Currency and others
Claimant: Jeremy Green
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1268 S JONES SPRING LANE, SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI ALONG WITH ALL ITS BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv03239
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1268 S JONES SPRING LANE, SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI ALONG WITH ALL ITS BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS, REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, REPLAT OF LOTS 2, 8, 8A, 9, & 9A OF JONES SPRING, A SUBDIVISION IN GREENE COUNTY, MISSOURI ALONG WITH ALL ITS BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS, REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1224 S JONES SPRING LANE, SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI ALONG WITH ALL ITS BUILDINGS, APPURTENANCES, AND IMPROVEMENTS and others
Claimant: Jennifer Obert, GusMavMur, LLC, Jennifer Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?