Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wells v. Finch et al
as 2:2025cv00237
Plaintiff:
Nancy Jo Wells
Defendant:
Keith Finch, Nathan Donaldson, Eric Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Finch et al
as 2:2025cv00238
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Williams
Defendant:
Keith Finch, Nathan Donaldson, Eric Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubio v. County of Mason, et al.
as 25-4930
Plaintiff:
BRANDON J. RUBIO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MASON, RYAN SPURLING, Sheriff, Mason County, KEVIN HANSON, Chief of Jail, Mason County Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Freeman v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The
as 3:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Greg Freeman
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Guy v. Stafford et al
as 5:2018cv00194
Defendant:
Doe, Greg Freeman, Carl McCree and others
Plaintiff:
Zerundrick Guy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
Greg Freeman
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sedgwick County Adult Service, et al
as 16-3201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN T. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
SEDGWICK COUNTY ADULT SERVICE CENTER, DONNA HAJJAR, Director, Sedwick County Adult Intermediate Services Center, in her individual and official capacity and GREG FREEMAN, Head of Intensive Supervision Officers, Sedgwick County Adult Intermediate Services Center, in his individual and official capacity
Bowman v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
Richard K Bowman
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Greg Freeman and Pat Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
