Cases 1 - 10 of 160
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-11106
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Tabitha McKenzie v. Casey Barren, et al
as 24-10852
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
CASEY T. BARREN, ERIC LOVE, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA and others
Groover-Floyd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00459
Petitioner:
Kendrick Groover-Floyd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Groover et al
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Jenarius C. Brown
Defendant:
Billy J. Groover, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and SLB Freightage Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Flynn v. NDOC et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Dawnyell Flynn
Defendant:
NDOC, FMWCC, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 3:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
Kimberly McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROOVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27577
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GROOVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GROOVER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29095
Plaintiff:
DANNY GROOVER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Groover v. Loreal USA, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv06887
Plaintiff:
April Groover
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc, LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Groover v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11741
Plaintiff:
Teresa Groover
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
