Cases 1 - 10 of 147
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BRANDON
Defendant:
HUMPHREY, GUINN and BOSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Semmes et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Khristopher Watkins
Defendant:
Danny Semmes, Edwardo Mendoza, Clarence Cormier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Guinn
as 23-60386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Terrance Carvell Guinn, also known as Terrence Carvell Guinn
McSean v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, George Killian, William Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Davids et al
as 2:2023cv11472
Plaintiff:
Antonio Demond Watkins
Defendant:
John Davids, Jonathan Poulos, G. David Guinn and others
Guinn v. USA
as 5:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Terrance Carvell Guinn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Guinn, Jr. v. Bostwick
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Al Guinn, Jr.
Defendant:
Stacey Bostwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marvel Jones v. Craig Gilsdore, et al
as 23-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marvel Jones
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Gilsdore, Agreement Administrator, Special Services Unit for Nebraska Department of Correction Services, in his individual capacity, Dr. Agnes M. Stanis, PH.D. for Nebraska Department of Correction Services, in her individual capacity, Sheriff Officer Unknown and others
Hull v. MaCauley
as 2:2022cv11318
Petitioner:
Omar S. Hull Jr.
Respondent:
G. David Guinn, F. Kay Bhem and Matt MaCauley
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
