Cases 21 - 30 of 42
ANDRIE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05059
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ANDRIE , MARY LOU ANDRIE , ROSS BRUPBACHER and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyson et al v. Russell et al
as 7:2012cv00132
Defendant:
Franklin County, Virginia, Highland Lake Inc., Edward C. Park, III and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberley H. Tyson and Mark V. Tyson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pearson v. Tyson et al
as 1:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Dondre Pearson
Defendant:
H. Tyson, O. Smith, R. Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Adams v. Tyson Foods, et al
as 11-3180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E. Tollett, Exec, Albert C. Zapanta, Exec and others
TYSON v. BUTTS
as 1:2011cv01154
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
LARRY H. TYSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Movant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Falcon v. Tyson, et al
as 1:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Falcon
Defendant:
H. Tyson and R. Guitron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collier v. Biter et al
as 1:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Collier
Defendant:
M.D. Biter, M. Jefferies, J. Castro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Harrington et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Robert Bishop
Defendant:
Kelly Harrington, M.D. Biter, J. Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
