Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Kassim et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Afrah Nahman Hameed Kassim and Malick Ali Ahmed Al-Qasri
Defendant:
Secretary Antony Blinken, Embassy of the United States of Djibouti and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Sanchez v. Abdullah et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Alondra E. Sanchez
Defendant:
Hamed Y. Abdullah, TAA Logistics, Inc. and Allen Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hames v. Bison Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hames
Defendant:
Bison Logistics LLC, Alexandru Popa and Ioana Popa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
