Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 13,840
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02147
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Hamilton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10716
Petitioner: DAVID C. HAMILTON
Respondent: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: Michael A. Gordon
Defendant: Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten v. Morgan & Morgan et al
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff: Shanneel Wooten
Defendant: Morgan & Morgan, Deanne Hamilton, Travis Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 2302 Federal Whistleblowing Act / Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA)
Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Brayton M Hamilton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Quality Correctional Health Care et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: Alfonzo Montel Johnson
Defendant: Quality Correctional Health Care, Hamilton County Jail and Hamilton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00819
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00818
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamilton v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00708
Plaintiff: Lester G Hamilton and Lester G. Hamilton
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Hamilton v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff: Charles Hamilton
Defendant: Victor Hill, Roland Boehrer, Terrance Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?