Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McFadden v. Amundsen Davis, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv08780
Plaintiff:
Corri McFadden
Defendant:
Amundsen Davis, LLC, Matthew Horn, Ryan Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
(PC) Cook v. Secretary of CDCR et al
as 1:2026cv05755
Plaintiff:
James Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR and Patwin Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Benjamin v. Horn et al
as 1:2026cv05677
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Benjamin
Defendant:
P. Horn, F. Beyerlin, E. Rameriz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horne v. Gregg County Sheriff's Division
as 6:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Richard Harold Horne, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN HORN et al v. USA
as 1:2026cv01040
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. VAN HORN and ELIZABETH A. PARISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Horne et al v. M.C. Dean, Inc.
as 3:2026cv00997
Plaintiff:
Brady Horne, Jack B. Rice, Operating Engineers Local Union No. 147 Health Fund and others
Defendant:
M.C. Dean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
v. Conroy et al
as 3:2026cv01445
Defendant:
Gordon Conroy, Michelle Broken Horn Outfitters and Patrick McCosker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Christian v. Horn
as 3:2026cv00500
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Christian
Defendant:
Captain Stephanie Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
