Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Amberly Williams v. ServiceSource, Inc.
as 26-2270
Plaintiff:
AMBERLY M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SERVICESOURCE, INC., JANET SAMUELSON, BRUCE PATTERSON and others
Huff v. Hollis Cobb Associates, LLC
as 2:2026cv02829
Plaintiff:
Dominque Huff
Defendant:
Hollis Cobb Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Huff v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv02502
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Huff
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Huff v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2026cv03755
Plaintiff:
Carla Huff
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
HUFF II v. WARDEN
as 2:2026cv10661
Petitioner:
FREDDIE WAYNE HUFF II
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Huff v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 4:2026cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jason Huff
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BEACH et al v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION et al
as 4:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN BEACH and SHAWNA MARIE BEACH
Defendant:
FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION, Clay Huff and Edward Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Crowe v. Mecklenburg County et al
as 3:2026cv00650
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County, City of Charlotte, FNU Delcone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Chien v. Commonwealth of VA
as 26-1988
Plaintiff:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VA, MARK R. HERRING, Attorney General, JAY JONES, Attorney General and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
