Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Singh v. Garland
as 23-6891
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Singh v. Wright et al
as 5:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Harpal Singh
Defendant:
Tonia Wright, Volunteer Express, Inc., Central Freight Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SINGH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2021cv20201
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINGH v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2021cv12985
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harpal Dutta v. Robert Wilkinson
as 21-70242
Respondent:
ROBERT M. WILKINSON, Acting Attorney General
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH DUTTA
Philip Petrone, et al v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 20-2500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fardrel J. Guice, John Robert Hardin, Wilson M. Dagaye and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Werner Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Werner Trucking and Drivers Management, LLC
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Bawa Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03127
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Wacissa River Music, Inc., Screen Gems-Emi Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rajpal Singh, Harpal Singh, Bawa Inc. d/b/a Sizzle and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Harpal Singh v. William Barr
as 19-71040
Petitioner:
HARPAL SINGH
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
SINGH v. IVERY et al
as 3:2016cv02077
Plaintiff:
HARPAL SINGH
Defendant:
DONIQUE IVERY, KIMBERLEE ADAMS, ABU AHSAN, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGH et al v. MCCONVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
KANWAR BIR SINGH , HARPAL SINGH and SATWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
