Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BARNES v. MINORICS et al
as 5:2023cv04712
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HARRY BARNES
Defendant:
JOSEPH MINORICS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnes et al v. 3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Harry Barnes, John Murray, Robert Desrosier and others
Defendant:
3 Rivers Telephone Cooperative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02384
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, INC., COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY BARNES and ANNETTE BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharon Harris Barnes v. Palo Verde Unified School District
as 5:2018cv00324
Defendant:
DOES and Palo Verde Unified School District
Plaintiff:
Sharon Harris Barnes
BARNES et al v. FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv05835
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF HARRY BARNES , ESTATE OF ANNA M. BARNES , SUE ANN BARNES and others
Defendant:
FIDELITY NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and WRIGHT NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Willie Sharp, Jr., et al v. USDC-MGF
as 14-72717
:
In re: WILLIE A. SHARP, Jr., FORRESTINA CALF BOSS RIBS, PAUL MCEVERS and others
Petitioner:
WILLIE A. SHARP, Jr., FORRESTINA CALF BOSS RIBS, PAUL MCEVERS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, GREAT FALLS
Real Party In Interest:
TOWN OF BROWNING, a Montana municipal corporation
Town of Browning v. Willie Sharp, Jr., et al
as 14-35719
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TOWN OF BROWNING, a Montana municipal corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE A. SHARP, Jr., FORRESTINA CALF BOSS RIBS, PAUL MCEVERS and others
Pierce v. Walsh et al
as 1:2007cv11305
Plaintiff:
Gerald Pierce
Defendant:
Maureen Walsh, Claire Hooley, Debra McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
