Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Sloan v. Hearst Media Company, et al
as 16-1885
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAM SLOAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HEARST TELEVISION, INC., WMUR-TV and DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ
Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. v. Green Law Firm, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc.
Defendant:
Green Law Firm, LLC, Isaacs & Isaacs, P.S.C., Media General Communications Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Papacoda v. Arkansas Hearst Television, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Mike Papacoda
Defendant:
Arkansas Hearst Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinolich et al v. New Orleans Hearst Television, Inc.
as 2:2015cv05376
Plaintiff:
Mark Martinolich and Holly Martinolich
Defendant:
New Orleans Hearst Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schloemer Mattress Outlet, Inc. v. Hearst Television, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00882
Plaintiff:
Schloemer Mattress Outlet, Inc.
Defendant:
Hearst Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
We 3 Kings, Inc. v. The Steve Harvey Show et al
as 2:2014cv08816
Defendant:
Alex Duda, KNBC, WTVR and others
Petitioner:
Michael R Shapiro
Plaintiff:
We 3 Kings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Village Green Apartments Associates, L.P. et al v. Hearst Television, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Village Green Apartments Associates, L.P. , Green Acre Property Management, Inc. and Brush Creek Village, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Hearst Television, Inc. , Hearst Stations, Inc. , KMBC-TV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Village Green Apartments Associates, L.P. v. Hearst Television, Inc.
as 4:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Village Green Apartments Associates, L.P.
Defendant:
Hearst Television, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanart v. Hearst Television Inc
as 5:2010cv00581
Plaintiff:
Ray Stanart
Defendant:
Hearst Television Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
