Cases 41 - 50 of 36,377
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Henry et al v. ACE Homes et al
as 1:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
James A. Henry and Aja N. Henry
Defendant:
ACE Homes and Bank of America Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28:l332 Diversity - Foreclosure
Chepilko v. Henry
as 24-1059
Petitioner:
SERGEI CHEPILKO
Defendant:
Police Officer SCOTT HENRY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Sergeant TARAKUR CHOWDHURY and others
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Dorletha Lambert v. Randy Philhours, et al
as 24-1831
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lasha Lambert
Defendant:
Randy F. Philhours, Judge, Craighead County Circuit Court, Charlene Henry, Prosecuting Attorney, Craighead County, David Vaughn, Trial Court Circuit Clerk, Craighead County and others
Spann v. Gov; Henry McMaster et al
as 3:2024cv02345
Plaintiff:
Freddy Spann
Defendant:
Gov; Henry McMaster and Mental Health Der Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LABONTE v. HENRY et al
as 2:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LABONTE
Defendant:
MICHELLE A. HENRY and CHRISTOPHER L. PARIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelby County, Alabama v. Beaulieu
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darling v. Zavaleta et al
as 1:2024cv21541
Plaintiff:
Santino T. Darling
Defendant:
Luis Zavaleta and Henry Quintero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Darien Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Devinn Jones, Isaac Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
