Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Owens v. Guaranteed Rate Mortgage, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Richard Henry Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Guaranteed Rate Mortgage, N.A., ServiceMac, LLC and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Henry Owens v. Hilton Grand Vacations Management LLC
as 22-1914
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
HENRY OWENS, individually and on behalf of minor children, M. O. and A. O. and MELLONEY OWENS, individually and on behalf of minor children, M. O. and A. O.
3Rd Party Defendant:
HILTON GRAND VACATIONS MANAGEMENT LLC, in personam
Burnam v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Burnam
Defendant:
Henry Owens and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. SA10115-R6-17581 v. Sage Sailing Inc et al
as 4:2019cv01883
Defendant:
Sagepost LLC, Henry Owens, Melloney Owens and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. SA10115-R6-17581
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Henry, Owen v. The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc.
as 0:2019cv61211
Plaintiff:
Henry Owen
Defendant:
Pep Boys - Manny, Moe & Jack, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451
Chaula Bhatt v. John Hoffman, et al
as 17-1182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Former NJ AG, AT&T INC, And Nationwide AT&T Subsidiaries, DENNIS M. GALVIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Owens v. State Board of Pardons & Paroles
as 6:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Henry Owens
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Owens v Walker
as 5:2007cv00345
Plaintiff:
Henry Owens
Defendant:
Warden Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
