Cases 61 - 70 of 3,629
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Provencio v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, William M Jones, Camille Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Specht Higgins & Associates, PC s v. GW Tax and Accounting, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Specht Higgins & Associates, PC successor in interest to FX Cassidy & Associates, PC
Defendant:
GW Tax and Accounting, LLC and Thomas Dewey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Moody et al v. Gartha et al
as 2:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody and Tracey Moody
Defendant:
Russell Charles Gartha, Harrison Ray Higgins, City of Southfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hocking v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hocking
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, D Green, M Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
