Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Comer v. Holliman et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Comer
Defendant:
Rhonda Holliman, Regan Rodke, BN #518 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holliman v. Stanton et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
David Holliman
Defendant:
Steve Stanton, Stanton Homes, LLC. and Zachary Stayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holliman v. Oliver et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Octavius Holliman
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Joshua Jones, Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliman v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Holliman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holliman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv24912
Plaintiff:
Jerry Holliman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lamont Holliman v. Col. Bowers
as 23-6985
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT ANGELO HOLLIMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COL. BOWERS, WILLIAM SMITH and LT. HUMPRESS
Phelps v. Holliman et al
as 5:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
Craig Allen Phelps
Defendant:
Daniel Holliman and Town of Dibble Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irvin-Holliman v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07326
Plaintiff:
Shatonex Irvin-Holliman
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., LOreal USA, Inc., LOreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
