Cases 81 - 90 of 490
Nasuti v. Holm
as 3:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Matt Nasuti
Defendant:
Adrian Holm, Judith Johnson Mekota, Denis Richard McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t Tort Claim
Alred v. Owens et al
as 6:2022cv06035
Plaintiff:
Roger Wayne Alred
Defendant:
Captain Cameron Owens, Ms. Holmes, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Harford County, Maryland
as 1:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry Verl Holmes, Sr.
Respondent:
Harford County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Raphael Holmes and Raphael J. Holmes
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Holmes et al v. Knodell
as 2:2022cv04026
Plaintiff:
Mary Holmes, L. V. and Empower Missouri
Defendant:
Robert Knodell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Hadzic et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Shannon Gibson
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hadzic, Officer Unknown Holmes and St. Louis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Keyes et al
as 0:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Henry James Holmes
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Ryan Keyes and Bach Dang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry v. Pitts et al
as 1:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Samuel Pitts and William Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Pitts et al
as 4:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Samuel Pitts and William Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gentry
Defendant:
Sgt. Sonja Collier, Will Holmes, Doug Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
