Cases 11 - 20 of 2,377
Anthony Hoover El v. Forsyth County
as 24-6224
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY
Anthony Hoover El v. Stephen Waddel
as 24-6226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, Warden IV, JASON ADAMS, Gatekeeper, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Magistrate and others
Anthony Hoover El v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6228
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JUDGE L. TODD BURKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin #794831 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Christien D. Martin #794831
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gretchen Whitmer, Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDELL, ROY A. COOPER III, ELIZABETH N. STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Kevin Coit v. L. Malichaik, et al
as 24-1228
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
L. MALICHAIK, RLPM, BOBBI JO SALAMON, Superintendent, M. ROWE, DSCS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
