Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kirschmann v. Coconino, County of et al
as 3:2026cv08019
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Louise Kirschmann
Defendant:
Coconino, County of, Patrice Horstman, Jeronimo Vasque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Horstman v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2025cv04971
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Horstman
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12743
Plaintiff:
Angela Jones, George Hogan, Cory Hokanson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Logan Dyjak v. Harvey Daniels, et al
as 25-2694
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
HARVEY DANIELS, Clinical Nurse Manager, JO-AN LYNN, Clinical Director and STACEY HORSTMAN
Jones et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01469
Plaintiff:
Angela Jones, George Hogan, Cory Hokanson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Logan Dyjak v. Jo-an Lynn, et al
as 25-2264
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
JO-AN LYNN, STACEY HORSTMAN and HARVEY DANIELS
Warrior v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2025cv03273
Plaintiff:
Strong Heart Warrior
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Town of Southampton, Southampton Village Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Horstman v. Moreno et al
as 3:2025cv01493
Plaintiff:
Michael Horstman
Defendant:
Moreno and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Damion Walker, et al
as 25-1609
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
DAMION WALKER, SARA BROYLES, LANA MILLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
